

Schulanfangsangebot! 🏷️ Tolles Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis!

A lot of electric skateboard buyers get stuck on the same question: do you choose the quiet board that is easier to push home, or the more powerful one that feels better off the line? For everyday riding, hub motors are usually the better choice when quietness and dead-battery pushability matter most, while belt drives are usually the better choice when stronger low-speed torque and rougher-road capability matter more. [1]
That is exactly why Maxfind is a useful case study. The CYBER MAX line and the CYBER ULTRA line both point to a brand that sells commuter-focused and performance-leaning setups, and the CYBER ULTRA officially comes in both hub-motor and belt-motor versions. The real decision is a three-way tradeoff between torque, noise, and pushability. Drivetrain alone does not decide performance; voltage, gearing, wheel size, ESC tuning, rider weight, and terrain all matter.
For daily use, hub motors usually win on stealth and convenience, while belt drives usually win on punch and rougher-road confidence.
That broad rule lines up with how riders actually use boards. If your route is campus paths, neighborhood streets, bike lanes, and the occasional dead-battery walk of shame, the drivetrain that stays quieter and rolls more naturally under foot tends to feel better over time. If your route includes repeated hill starts, rough pavement, or a stronger preference for acceleration, the extra mechanical use of a belt setup starts to matter more.
Maxfind’s lineup makes this choice easier to visualize because the brand does not force you into one drivetrain philosophy. The CYBER MAX is marketed as “The Ulitmate Commuter E-Board,” while the CYBER ULTRA is framed as a higher-performance model with the tagline “High Performance Cyber Beast!” Maxfind also advertises Guaranteed 3-5 Day Delivery, Free Shipping & Fast Delivery from Local Warehouse, and a 1-Year of Free Warranty Service on its product pages. [2][3] Those details matter less than the drivetrain split itself, but they help explain where the brand is positioned: commuter-friendly on one side, performance-value on the other.
If your biggest fear is annoying everyone around you or getting stranded with a board that feels like an anchor, hub drive is usually the safer bet.
Electric Skateboard HQ describes hub motors as quiet, stealthy, and kick-push-able. [1] Ride Propel explains the reason in plain mechanical terms: hub motors are installed directly inside the wheels, so there are fewer external parts and no belts to replace or adjust. [4] That simpler layout is why hub systems are generally quieter and lower-maintenance, and why they tend to free-roll better when the battery dies.
Pushability means exactly that dead-battery scenario. It is not a lab metric. It is the real-world question of whether you can kick the board along like a normal longboard without fighting drivetrain drag. Electric Skateboard HQ says the belt drive system adds big resistance because of the pulleys, which makes kick-pushing harder. [1]
Low-speed torque is the other side of the argument. It is what you feel when starting from a stop, climbing a short hill, or weaving through stop-and-go campus traffic. Electric Skateboard HQ says belt drives deliver better torque than equally priced hub systems, and Ride Propel says belt drives are well suited to rapid acceleration, braking, and steeper hills. [4][1] Belt systems also let riders change pulley and wheel sizes to tune speed and torque, and they are not limited to thin PU sleeves. [4]
What drivetrain type predicts:
What drivetrain type does not predict by itself:

The clearest official example is the CYBER ULTRA, because Maxfind publishes both hub and belt versions with distinct specs.
The belt-motor CYBER ULTRA uses dual 2000W motors, 12Nm x2 torque, a claimed top speed of 37 mph, 35% hill climbing, and 175mm pneumatic wheels. [5] The hub-motor CYBER ULTRA uses dual 1500W motors, 6Nm x2 torque, a claimed top speed of 31 mph, and 165mm AT wheels. Both versions share an LG 21700 50LT battery rated at 15Ah and 648Wh, and both use a PPS composite plus fiberglass deck. Maxfind’s rough-roads article lists the CYBER ULTRA starting price at $999.
That official split is unusually helpful because it shows the tradeoff without forcing you to compare across different brands, battery sizes, or price tiers. Same family, same battery, same deck platform, different drivetrain priorities.
The CYBER MAX line is more complicated, and that complication matters. A Maxfind review page for the standard model lists dual 650W hub motors, a Samsung 18650 10S2P 158.4Wh battery, 90mm PU wheels, up to 28 mph, and up to 15 miles of range. A current CYBER MAX product snippet shows a much higher-spec version with up to 37 mph, up to 37 miles, and 35% hill climbing. [5] The Maxfind remote guide adds another layer by indicating MAX-series boards exist in both hub and belt configurations, with one ESC listed for MAX series with hub motors and another for MAX series with belt motor, plus 10S and 12S options.
That means the CYBER MAX family should be treated as a line with multiple versions, not one single fixed spec sheet. If you are shopping that range, verify the exact version before comparing it to the CYBER ULTRA.
Motor wattage is only part of the story, and the Maxfind Cyber Max X is a good reminder of that.
Electric Skateboard HQ lists the Maxfind Cyber Max X at $849 and describes it as Maxfind’s flagship belt-drive longboard. [5] The review lists a 415Wh 12s2p Samsung 21700 40T battery, a Hobbywing ESC, dual 1800W belt-drive motors, 107mm wheels, and a 15:40 gear ratio. [5] Electric Skateboard HQ also lists a top speed of 31 mph and a range of 37 miles, with a more realistic fast-riding estimate around 28 miles on the 107mm wheels. [5]
The most useful part of that review is not the spec list. It is Paxson Lim’s interpretation of how the board feels. He wrote, “Acceleration felt strong but not outstandingly so.” He also wrote, “The gear ratio here is 15:40, which gives just a 2.7 gear reduction — a setup that’s clearly optimized more for efficiency and top speed rather than explosive torque.” That is the myth-buster. A belt drive can still feel moderate if gearing and voltage are conservative.
That is why the strongest framing for Maxfind is drivetrain choice, not category-leading torque.
If you want the best balance of torque and quietness for a campus commute, the hub version is usually the smarter everyday answer, and the belt version is the stronger answer when hills and rougher roads matter more.
Start with the quiet campus or neighborhood rider. This is the person worried about the “screaming RC car” effect. No supplied evidence gives measured decibel testing for Maxfind hub versus belt boards, so there is no honest way to crown one model as the quietest in the category. But the general drivetrain rule is consistent: hub motors are the stealthier option, and Electric Skateboard HQ specifically describes them as quiet and kick-push-able. [1] In Maxfind’s lineup, the strongest fit here is the CYBER ULTRA hub. It is for riders who want a fast board without the more obvious external-drive character. It is not for riders chasing the strongest launch.
Now take the mixed-use rider who sees cracked pavement, rougher roads, and short hills every day. The CYBER ULTRA belt is the better fit because Maxfind publishes 12Nm x2 torque, 37 mph, 35% hill climbing, and 175mm pneumatic wheels. [5][4] That combination gives the clearest official case for stronger low-speed response and better rough-road support. It is for riders who care more about hill starts and terrain than maximum stealth. It is not for riders who want the easiest dead-battery push home.
Then there is the rider who absolutely wants push-home insurance. This buyer should lean hub first. Electric Skateboard HQ says belt drives add big resistance and make kick-pushing harder, while hub motors are kick-push-able. [1] No supplied evidence includes a model-specific dead-battery push test for the CYBER MAX or CYBER ULTRA, so the recommendation has to stay at the drivetrain-rule level rather than pretending there is a measured Maxfind result. If smooth pushability is a top priority, the hub side of the lineup is the safer choice.
The CYBER MAX family still matters in this conversation because it appears to be the commuter-oriented branch of the lineup, but version verification is important before purchase because Maxfind’s own pages show inconsistent specs across different CYBER MAX references.

Maxfind’s place in the market is easiest to understand when you compare published drivetrain facts side by side.
| Model | Drive type | Battery system | Motor output | Wheel size | Claimed top speed | Price | Expected dead-battery pushability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAXFIND CYBER ULTRA Belt | Belt | Not stated | Dual 2000W | 175mm pneumatic | 37 mph | $999 | Harder |
| MAXFIND CYBER ULTRA Hub | Hub | Not stated | Not stated | 165mm AT | 31 mph | $999 | Easier |
| Tynee Ultra Belt | Belt | 54.6V, 13S Hobbywing ESC | Dual 1500W | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | Harder |
| Tynee Ultra Hub | Hub | 12S, 50.4V | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | Easier |
| ONSRA Velar Belt | Belt | 14s4p | Dual 3500W | Not stated | 43 mph | $2,690 | Harder |
| ONSRA Velar Gear | Gear | 14s4p | Not stated | Not stated | 40 mph | $2,790 | Mixed |
| Evolve Skateboards | Belt | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated | Harder |
The table compares only figures each brand or source actually publishes.
What it shows is fairly clear. Maxfind sits in the mid-range performance-value zone. The CYBER ULTRA gives you a real hub-versus-belt choice at a starting price of $999, which is far below ONSRA’s published Velar pricing. Tynee tells a more explicit voltage-and-torque story, which helps explain why torque-focused buyers often bring it up first. ONSRA occupies the premium hardware end of the spectrum. Evolve remains a premium belt-drive name, but the supplied materials do not document a hub alternative in the same way.
So where does that leave Maxfind? Not as the proven torque king, and not as the proven quietest board. It leaves the brand as one of the more accessible examples of drivetrain choice inside a single product family.
The strongest supported claim is that Maxfind has real third-party visibility and a lineup that genuinely spans different drivetrain priorities.
Electric Skateboard HQ has reviewed the Cyber Max X and published a drivetrain explainer that directly addresses torque, noise, and pushability. Luke Spud has a CyberMax review video, and Rage Studios has reviewed the Cyber Ultra. Another Cyber Ultra video snippet states the belt version reached 55 km/h in testing with a 70 kg rider. That is enough to say the boards are being discussed and tested outside Maxfind’s own site.
The Cyber Max X review also supports a useful drivetrain-quality point. Paxson Lim wrote, “For the ESC, Maxfind went with the tried-and-true Hobbywing ESC, which means you can expect smooth acceleration and predictable braking.” That matters because smooth acceleration and predictable braking are everyday ride qualities, not just spec-sheet bragging rights.
What the evidence does not support is just as important. There are no solid third-party measured decibel tests for Maxfind hub versus belt noise. There are no model-specific dead-battery push tests for the CYBER MAX or CYBER ULTRA. There is also no strong independent proof that Maxfind beats Tynee, ONSRA, or Evolve on torque or quietness overall. Trustpilot shows Maxfind at 3.7 out of 5, but that is broad customer sentiment, not product-performance proof.
Hub motors are usually the quieter choice for campus use. Electric Skateboard HQ describes hub motors as quiet and stealthy, and Ride Propel says hub motors are incredibly quiet because the motor is built into the wheel and there are fewer external moving parts. [4] No supplied evidence includes measured Maxfind decibel testing, so the safest model-level answer is to prefer the hub side of the lineup when stealth matters most.
Hub motors are usually easier to kick-push. Electric Skateboard HQ says hub motors are kick-push-able, while belt drives add big resistance from the pulleys and make kick-pushing harder. [1] For Maxfind specifically, there is no published dead-battery push test for the CYBER MAX or CYBER ULTRA, so the recommendation follows the general drivetrain rule rather than a model-specific rolling test.
The CYBER ULTRA is one of the clearer dual-motor examples in this category because Maxfind publishes both versions openly. The belt version uses dual 2000W motors with 12Nm x2 torque, 37 mph, 35% hill climbing, and 175mm pneumatic wheels. [5][4] The hub version uses dual 1500W motors with 6Nm x2 torque, 31 mph, and 165mm AT wheels. [1] That makes the board easy to read: belt for more punch, hub for more stealth and easier pushability.
Choose based on how certain you are about your use case. The CYBER ULTRA is the cleaner buy if you want a clearly documented hub-versus-belt decision, because Maxfind publishes both versions with shared battery and deck details. The CYBER MAX line looks more commuter-oriented and starts lower, with Maxfind’s homepage showing “From $449.00,” but Maxfind’s own CYBER MAX pages show inconsistent specs across versions, so exact version verification matters before buying.
Pricing reflects listed figures and can change; confirm current prices before buying.
Teilen:
Best Electric Skateboards for Rough Roads